Tag Archives: NRA

The NRA asks “Are the President’s kids more important than yours?”. The answer? Yes.

The NRA spent it’s members money creating a lovely pile of steaming hyperbole. See it for yourself:



Now, moving past the obviousness of the stupidity (the President’s kids go to a private school, where their tuition pays for whatever they want, the NRA wants to put random volunteers to roam the halls of America with weapons, and Secret Service > Bubba with a pistol, etc), the question underlying is one of simplicity – is the President, any President, and his family intrinsically more important than yours?




Let’s go back a decade, so no one thinks I’m showing favoritism.  Dubya and his wife and kids all had Secret Service details.  And they should.  And here’s why.

If you die tomorrow, your family and friends will be very sad.  You might get a notice in your local paper.  If you died in a spectacularly bad way, you might make the national news.  But, it will be a rather small footnote.

If Dubya died in office, history books are immediately re-written.  The nation goes into turmoil.  International markets temporarily tailpsin.

If your child died tomorrow, you would be heartbroken.

If Dubya’s kid died in office, every media in the world would focus their eyes on the First Family.

If your spouse died, you would be inconsolable.

If Laura died, her grieving husband would be beside himself…and would still have to lead 300 million people.


So, no, random dude who works at a cell phone store, you aren’t as important as the President.

You don’t have an average of 30 death threats a day.

You don’t have the keys to a nuclear arsenal.

You don’t lead 300 million people, and affect secondarily the lives of 6 billion on Earth.

When your every decision affects everything from the stock market to the 6’oclock news, then you get the same security as the Commander in Chief and their family.


And if after all that, you don’t seem to understand why you don’t get what the President gets, may I suggest you not breed, and make the whole ad moot.

US Shootings and the myth of the ‘crazed gunman’.

(Editor’s note:  If you want conspiracy, go here).


Since no actual changes will be made to gun control or regulation (thanks, NRA and the politicians currently taking your blood money!), I thought I’d address an issue with post-shooting armchair psychiatry.  It never fails, after a mass shooting in the US, someone says “If only this crazy person wouldn’t have snapped, everything would have been okay”.  To begin, we need to understand that there are several definitions of ‘crazy’ (insane).

US Legal definition:  Mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.  Unsoundness of mind sufficient in the judgment of a civil court to render a person unfit to maintain a contractual or other legal relationship or to warrant commitment to a mental health facility.

US societal definition:  Mental illness or derangement.  No longer used in Medical form, instead use ‘mental health issues’.

As you can see, one can have mental health issues without necessarily being ‘insane’ in the legal sense of the word.  Plenty of people with mental health issues (author included) can attend day-to-day interactions without blowing away a school.  Important distinction.

The next issue concerns our uncomfortability with the human condition.  We don’t want to think of ourselves as base creatures, capable of extreme violence or disregard for humanity, so whenever a tragedy strikes, we call the assailant ‘crazy’.  After all, only an insane person would harm a child, right?  Well, according the the US government’s Administration for Children and Families:

“In 2004 approximately 3.5 million children were involved in investigations of alleged abuse or neglect in the US, while an estimated 872,000 children were determined to have been abused or neglected, and an estimated 1,490 children died that year because of abuse or neglect. In 2007, 1,760 children died as the result of child abuse and neglect.[1] Child abuse impacts the most vulnerable populations, with children under age five years accounting for 76% of fatalities.[2] In 2008, 8.3 children per 1000 were victims of child abuse and neglect and 10.2 children per 1000 were in out of home placement.[3]

Were all the people in the above issues insane?  No.  Some may have been, but the majority were just awful human beings.  In fact, some of the most extensive abuses came from people lucid enough to create intricate machinations of torture and death.  From Pol Pot, Stalin, and Hitler, to the US’s own KKK, these people killed millions upon millions of innocent humans, and did knowing full well it was wrong.

So why do we want to run to the ‘crazy’ card?  Because it gives us a false sense of security.  We don’t do awful things, damaged people do.  We are good, we are decent, we would never be like that.  Every time a serial killer is caught, the neighbors go on tv and say the same thing – “He seemed so normal, we never suspected.”.  That’s the point – he was ‘normal’, but he was also an awful person.  Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, worked for the city, was a scout leader, former head of his church, and methodically killed 10 women over a 17 year period.  He knew exactly what he was doing; he knew it was wrong; he did it anyways.  He was evil – he wasn’t insane.

It may explain why when a person of color commits an atrocity, they are evil, but when a white dude from our country does it, he’s nuts.  No one called for psych evals on the 9/11 bombers, they just talked about how evil the people involved were.  Yet here, we immediately play armchair Freuds and proclaim a pre-emptive insanity defence.  It’s the us-vs-them situation.  They are terrorists; we are just a lone nut.  They are evil; we are mentally unstable.  They could have stopped themselves, we had no control.  We separate ourselves from evil acts by assigning insanity to the aggressor to soothe ourselves as a society.  Problem is, it doesn’t stop the next killing.

It’s all academic in the end.  After all, in a week we’ll all take down our commemorative avatars, and go back to obsessing over whatever reality show is popular, and the NRA will continue its tireless quest to keep para-military equipment in the hands of everyone.  Nothing will actually change, and we’ll all pretend to be surprised when the next mass shooting occurs.  But at the very least, the next time around, maybe we can assume the assailant is bad before we assume they are ‘nuts’.


Post Tragedy, How To Avoid Online Scams

(Editor’s note:  If you want conspiracy, go here).


As the names of the children and staff of Sandy Hook are formally released to the public, social media will be flooded with memes of remembrance and tributes. While some of the people creating these images have only the best intentions, many more are spreading these viral images for underhanded and sometimes illegal purposes. Here’s a list of ways that you can help and avoid becoming a victim.

1. The Facebook ‘Like and Share’: We’ve all seen the photos on Facebook – a little girl hooked up to machines in a hospital bed, asking you to like and share if you would like to see an end to cancer. Some even show a once healthy, now sadly deceased child, imploring you to help them break a world record for likes, so their sweet baby in heaven can see how much she touched lives, or imploring you to wear a certain color on a certain day in her memory, and to pass this message to everyone you know. Even more touching is when the creator of the page claims they will donate $1 for every hundred likes and shares, if you like their page first.

Problem is, most of these are completely fake memes, usually taken from pre-made photos of grieving parents without their knowledge. Every time you like and share one of these images, the algorithm in the social media platform you are using assigns that image a level of importance – the more people who like and share, the higher importance that image has. That explains why sometimes you see the same image three or four times on your news feed. When people ‘like’ the page that created the meme (usually a name like “All The Newtown Babies Are Now Angels”), that page also rises through the algorithm rankings. The creator of the page then sells the page wholesale to the highest bidder in online marketer forums. The name of the page is changed (usually to a cheap product page) and your facebook feed gets flooded with sales spam.

(Edited to add:  I just screencapped this from a ‘memorial’ facebook page – parents of very much alive children are finding their kid’s pictures on ‘Shooting victims’ photo collages.  Stay classy, scam artists!)


2. The ‘Commemorative Sales’ page: I’ve seen this across every social media board – a link to a page where a commemorative car magnet or mug is being sold, with “a portion of the profits” going to help the grieving families. Any time a sales page says “portion” of profits, they usually mean less than 1% of whatever they make off the scam, if that. You are better off donating directly to the community than buying whatever trinket is being offered to you online.

3. The Celeb quote or real-time update: This is a rather cruel trick, even compared to the above, where an anonymous meme will proclaim the dying words of a victim, or attribute a celebrity quote to further their own cause. The meme will say something like “Little Jessica’s last words were: ‘I hope people know my mommy and daddy were the best for me’ – LIKE and SHARE if you support traditional marriage!!!”, or ‘If only everyone in Sandy Hook had guns, this tragedy could have been avoided “ – Morgan Freeman’. These are almost always completely false, and preys on the emotional side of us to try and score political points for whatever the creator’s cause is.
If you are ever in doubt, go to a fact checking site like Snopes to see if the story you are spreading is real or a lie. They are unfortunately already very busy picking out fake images spreading from the Newtown, Connecticut shooting, which means there are going to be a lot more scam artists working in the next few days.

So how can you avoid scams, while also helping the victims of a tragedy? Here are some top tips:

1. If you want to donate to a community, go to their local webpage (almost every town has one) or local affiliate news station’s site. They will have detailed information on how to assist the community, from financial donations to blood drives. Your re-tweets or upvotes will not help anyone – they need cash for counsellors, funerals, and to repair buildings.

2.Many larger online entities will have donation pots available online for site-or –community specific donations. Amazon, Ebay, PayPal, and other larger retailers have a safe and secure way to donate money. If it’s not a webpage you’ve heard of before, don’t give them your credit card details! You are simply asking to be a victim of credit card fraud.

3.Contact your local Red Cross and ask to send your donation specifically to the victims of the tragedy. Larger charities have a great support network, and can get your donation straight to the source.

These are all completely safe ways to help in any post-catastrophe situation which ensures your donation will have the greatest bang for its buck when helping the victims and their families.

And finally, if you feel laws should change after a horrific incident, sharing a commemorative ribbon online and then forgetting about it in a week will not work. You have to pick up the phone and call your representatives from the House of Representatives, Senate, and White House to see change. A picture shared on Twitter or Myspace only makes you feel good for a second – a letter to your legislator could save future lives.

House Directory here
Senate Directory here
White House Directory here

Newtown, Connecticut – Sandy Hook school shooting. Or, any other shooting. The next shooting.

(Editor’s note:  If you want conspiracy, go here).


STOP saying your heart breaks for the newest round of dead.
STOP praying for the victims’ families.
STOP saying you’re sick about the whole thing.




House Directory here
Senate Directory here
White House Directory here

Your prayers do nothing for the future victims. Your phone call, however, could save a life.

Death by the numbers.

A man killed and wounded a bunch of people last night.

He went into a movie theatre, threw a gas canister, and opened fire.

The local police chief confirmed the suspect was wearing ballistic helmet, ballistic vest, ballistic leggings, throat protector, groin protector, black gloves.  

He also confirmed the killer had a AR-15 assault rifle, a 12-gauge shotgun and a .40 Glock handgun, a fourth in the theatre, and ‘buckets’ of ammunition in his home.

The shooter, James Holmes, has at this time no known criminal history.

This is what those weapons look like.  

The AR-15 can shoot over 400 rounds (bullets) per minute.

ABC news reports the guns were all bought legally, the first being in May.  You can purchase the most powerful weapon online (free shipping this week!)

The most powerful of the weapons, the AR-15, would have been illegal to purchase, but the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (the federal assault weapons ban provision) was only good for ten years, and lapsed under the Bush administration.  Multiple attempts to re-initialize the ban have been blocked by lobbying groups such as the NRA.  Their celebratory article about the lapse can be found here.   The six attempts to re-intitialize the ban are here: 1 2 3 4 5 6.

The NRA, a tax-sheltered 501c4 lobbying organization, made $227,811,279 last year.  This does not include its subsidiary organizations, of which it lists 30, each with their own intake of cash in the millions.

In 2011 the NRA spent 2.9 million dollars on lobbying Capitol Hill.  Of their top 20 beneficiaries, 17 were Republican.  Most of their donations went to PACs, which cannot be traced to individuals.

In 2007, the US was named the most heavily armed nation in the world, with 90 guns per 100 people.  If that trend stayed flat, in 2012 there are  282,589,477 guns for 313,988,308 people in the US.

The earliest modern mass shooting occured in 1949.

1949 – 13 killed.

1966 – 16 killed, 30 wounded.

1982 – 13 killed.

1984 – 21 killed.

1991 – 24 killed.

1999 – 13 killed, 23 wounded.

2007 – 32 killed.

2009 – 1o killed.

2009 – 13 killed, 4 injured.

2009 – 13 killed, 32 injured.  

The United States is 12th overall in countries by firearm related deaths, and #1 in ‘westernized’ nations.

Over 1,000,000 Americans have been killed by guns since 1968.  That is more than US soldiers who died in WWI, WWII, and Vietnam combined.